0.8.0.0
Common table expressions
Beam now supports common table expressions on some backends, using the
With
monad. Currently, only SELECT
statements are supported.
Changes to field name modification
EntityModification
is now a Monoid
.
Instead of taking the beam-determined name, the renamingFields
function instead takes a Data.List.NonEmpty
value containing the
names of each Haskell record selector that led to this field.
For example, in the following
data Embedded f =
Embedded { _field1 :: Columnar f Text
, _field2 :: Columnar f Int }
data Table1 f =
Table1 { _tbl1FieldA :: Columnar f Text
, _tbl1Embedded :: Embedded f }
db = defaultDbSettings `withDbModification`
dbModification { table1 = renamingFields f }
f
would be called with ["_tbl1FieldA"]
, ["_tbl1Embedded", "_field1"]
and ["_tbl1Embedded", "_field2"]
.
Simplified types
Every beam SQL backend is now an instance of BeamSqlBackend
and has an
associated syntax via an associated type family. This means types are much simpler.
Another benefit is that MonadBeam
now has a simpler type and can be used with
monad transformers. For example, writing a computation that may call out to a
postgres database is as simple as
dbComputation :: MonadBeam Postgres m => m result
versus before
dbComputation :: MonadBeam PgCommandSyntax Postgres Pg.Connection m => m result
Things become simpler if you want to write database agnostic computations. You can now do
dbComputation :: (BeamSqlBackend be, MonadBeam be m) => m result
versus before
dbComputation :: ( Sql92SanityCheck syntax, MonadBeam syntax be hdl m ) => m result
Removal of HasDefaultSqlDataTypeConstraints
The changes above make a separate HasDefaultSqlDataTypeConstraints
class unnecessary. The defaultSqlDataTypeConstraints
method is now
included within the HasDefaultSqlDataType
class.
Changes to parseOneField and peekField
Formerly, the peekField
function would attemt to parse a field
without advancing the column pointer, regardless of whether a field
was successfully parsed. In order to support more efficient parsing,
this has been changed. When peekField
returns a Just
value, then
the column pointer is advanced to the next pointer. This means you do
not need to call parseOneField
again to advance the pointer.
You can still chain peekField
calls together by using the new
Alternative
instance for FromBackendRowM
.
0.7.2.0
Add compatibility with GHC 8.4 and stack nightly
0.7.1.0
Note ‘0.7.1.0’ was released because the signature of delete
was too specific
in ‘0.7.0.0’ due to an error when uploading the package.
0.7.0.0
Weaker functional dependencies on MonadBeam
The functional dependency on MonadBeam
is now just m -> syntax be handle
. This allows us to define MonadBeam
instances atop monad transformers
(although we don’t have any yet!).
Correct boolean handling
Previous versions of beam used the SQL =
operator to compare potentially
NULL
values. This is incorrect, as NULL = NULL => UNKNOWN
in ANSI-compliant
implementations. Beam has changed its emitted SQL to produce proper comparisons,
but this can dramatically affect performance in some backends. Particularly,
proper JOIN index usage in Postgres requires an exact match on an equality
constructor, which may not be what you get when using the proper boolean
handling.
If you are okay using SQL null handling, you can use the new ==?.
and /=?.
operators which produce an expression with type SqlBool
instead. SqlBool
is
a type that can represent the SQL BOOL
type in all its gritty glory. Note
however, that these operators do not compare for haskell equality, only SQL
equality, so please understand what that means before using them.
Correspondingly, many functions that took Bool
expressions now have
corresponding versions that take SqlBool
. For example, to use guard_
with a
SqlBool
expression use guard_'
(note the prime).
(Note: I don’t really like that we have to do this, but this is the only way
unless we introspect user expressions. Beam’s philosophy is to be as direct as
possible. The ==.
operator corresponds to haskell ==
, and so produces the
boolean we would expect as Haskell programmers. The ==?.
operator is a new
operator that users must explicitly opt in to. Both produce the most direct code
possible on each backend.)
Aggregations return Maybe
types
In previous versions of beam, aggregations such as avg_
, sum_
, etc
returned the an expression of the same type as its inputs. However,
this does not match standard SQL behavior, where these aggregates can
return NULL if no rows are selected for the aggregation. This breaks
older code, but is more correct. To restore the older behavior, use
the fromMaybe_
function to supply a default value.
Miscellaneous name changes
The Database.Beam.Query.lookup
function was renamed to lookup_
to
avoid overlap with the Prelude
function of the same name.
Reintroduce explicit backends to Database
class
Some database entites only work on particular backends. For example,
beam-postgres extension support only works in beam-postgres. The lack
of a backend parameter on the Database
type class essentially
mandated that every database entity worked on every backend. By
introducing a backend parameter to Database
, we allow the user to
restrict which backends a database can work on.
The old behavior is still easily recovered. Whereas before you’d write
instance Database MyDatabase
Now write
instance Database be MyDatabase
Require backends to explicitly declare types that can be compared for equality
Beam previously allowed any two types to be compared for SQL
equality. This is no longer the case. Rather, only types that are
instances of HasSqlEqualityCheck
for the given expression syntax can
be checked for equality. Correspondingly, only types that are
instances of HasSqlQuantifiedEqualityCheck
can be checked for
quantified equality.
This change is somewhat invasive, as the relationship and join
operators depend on the ability to check primary keys for
equality. You may have to add appropriate class constraints to your
queries. In order to assert that a table can be compared for equality,
you can use the HasTableEquality
constraint synonym.
For Backends
Backend implementors should establish instances of
HasSqlEqualityCheck
and HasSqlQuantifiedEqualityCheck
for every
type that can be compared in their syntax. You may choose to implement
a custom equality and inequality operator. Alternatively, you can
leave the instances empty to use the defaults, which match the old
behavior.
Properly deal with NULL values in equality
Previous versions of Beam would use SQL =
and <>
operators to
compare potentially NULL
values. However, NULL = NULL
is always
false, according to the SQL standard, so this behavior is incorrect.
Now, Beam will generate a CASE .. WHEN ..
statement to explicitly
handle mismatching NULL
s. This is the ‘expected’ behavior from the
Haskell perspective, but does not match what one may expect in
SQL. Note that it is always better to explicitly handle NULL
s using
maybe_
, and beam recommends this approach in robust code.
Remove Auto
for fields with default values
Auto
was a convenience type for dealing with tables where some
columns have been given a default value. Auto
worked well enough but
it was a very leaky abstraction. Moreover, it was
unnecessary. Everything you can do with Auto
can be done more safely
with default_
.
For example, instead of using
insertValues [ Table1 (Auto Nothing) "Field Value" "Another Field Value" ]
use
insertExpressions [ Table1 default_ (val_ "Field Value") (val_ "Another Field Value") ]
0.6.0.0
- Mostly complete SQL92, SQL99 support
- Piecemeal support for SQL2003 and SQL2008 features
- Completely modular backends
- Various bug improvements and fixes
0.5.0.0
- Move to using finally tagless style for SQL generation
- Split out backends from
beam-core
- Allow non-table entities to be stored in databases
- Basic migrations support